Received: from nsi.edu (amethea.nsi.edu [198.133.185.9]) by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA38437 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:42:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from reina@nsi.edu) Received: from nsi.edu (IDENT:reina@bigred.nsi.edu [204.128.156.214]) by nsi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA25912; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:42:21 -0800 (PST) Sender: reina@nsi.edu Message-ID: <36E6BD8E.F0B7B4B3@nsi.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 18:44:30 +0000 From: "G. Anthony Reina" Organization: The Neurosciences Institute X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.1 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Slagle CC: pgsql-sql@hub.org Subject: Re: [SQL] Performance References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jason Slagle wrote: > And how long is normal for Vacuum analyze to take on bout 350 megs of > DATA? > > Jason > My database is 1.4 Gig. It takes about 2-3 minutes for a vacuum analyze verbose. I have had problems in the past with a corrupted main index (the table of tables). In such a case, the vacuum never stops even after > 48 hours. Try vacuuming your tables one-by-one if you have really long vaccums (> 1 hour). If the tables vacuum one-by-one alright, then you have a corrupted main index. -Tony