Received: from trends.net (root@clio.trends.ca [209.47.148.2]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA00636 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 23:41:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from J_Shevland@TurnAround.com.au) Received: from WEBBSD1.turnaround.com.au (webbsd1.turnaround.com.au [203.39.138.49]) by trends.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA24582 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 23:31:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from TurnAround.com.au (dhcp68.turnaround.com.au [192.168.1.68]) by WEBBSD1.turnaround.com.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA16633; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:40:19 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from J_Shevland@TurnAround.com.au) Message-ID: <371BF57E.65B22B6@TurnAround.com.au> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 13:33:18 +1000 From: Joe Shevland Reply-To: J_Shevland@TurnAround.com.au Organization: Turnaround Solutions Pty. Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael J Davis CC: "'pgsql-sql@postgreSQL.org'" Subject: Re: [SQL] OUTER JOINS References: <93C04F1F5173D211A27900105AA8FCFC1453E2@lambic.prevuenet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Aha, I was wondering where they were dredged from :) Is 6.5 going to support OJ's? Michael J Davis wrote: > > *= and =* are Oracle syntax for outer joins. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Janowski [SMTP:danj@3skel.com] > Sent: Monday, April 19, 1999 7:27 AM > To: J_Shevland@TurnAround.com.au > Cc: pgsql-sql@postgreSQL.org > Subject: Re: [SQL] OUTER JOINS > > Thanks for giving it a stab. Looking at the available > operators, > there is no =* or *= ops available. Although I am curious > where it > comes from. > > Dan > > Joe Shevland wrote: > > ... > > select t1.value from table_one t1, table_two t2 where > t1.key = t2.key; > > > > So this would be a straight LEFT join in my understanding. > Now, I'm > > venturing beyond my experience with PostgreSQL here, but > you may be able > > to use the associated SQL syntaxes: > > > > select ... where t1.key *= t2.key > > select ... where t1.key =* t2.key > > ... > > > > Dan Janowski wrote: > > > > > > I've looked through the docs and mail lists but I am > coming > > > up short on references for LEFT/RIGHT/FULL OUTER JOIN > > > avalability > > > or functional workarounds. It seems that PostgreSQL does > > > not have it. > > > > > > Any recommendations on how to aproximate the > functionality? > > > > > > As a curiosity, is there a problem with supporting these > > > OUTER joins or is it merely on the list? > > > > > -- > Dan Janowski danj@3skel.com Triskelion Systems, > Inc. Bronx, NY -- --------------------------------------------- ,-._|\ | Joe Shevland / \ | Principal Consultant \_,--._/ | Turnaround Solutions Pty. Ltd. v | http://www.TurnAround.com.au --------------------------------------------- Skate to where the puck is going and not to where it has been - Wayne Gretzky