X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0175E46F2 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:12:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62594-01 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:12:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED935E46EE for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:12:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 75so99319rnl for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.162.63 with SMTP id k63mr1183416rne; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.76.30 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <37d451f70408301512535d4e3e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:12:35 -0500 From: Rosser Schwarz Reply-To: Rosser Schwarz To: Tom Lane Subject: Re: function fails where individual statements succeed Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <11478.1093899801@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <37d451f7040830101763682930@mail.gmail.com> <11133.1093897977@sss.pgh.pa.us> <37d451f704083013401926a341@mail.gmail.com> <11478.1093899801@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/329 X-Sequence-Number: 18826 while you weren't looking, Tom Lane wrote: > Does the other case have any partial indexes? No it doesn't, and I caught it on reflection. > I'd describe that as "miraculously managing not to > fail", though, not as a behavior I'd care to rely on. Most definitely not; it's already changed. /rls -- :wq