Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF24475DF3 for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 16:44:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4364A475988 for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 16:13:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g4EKDHW00399; Tue, 14 May 2002 16:13:18 -0400 (EDT) To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: aggregate... In-reply-to: <1729482965.1021399989@andromede.reaumur.absolight.net> References: <1729482965.1021399989@andromede.reaumur.absolight.net> Comments: In-reply-to Mathieu Arnold message dated "Tue, 14 May 2002 18:13:09 +0200" Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 16:13:17 -0400 Message-ID: <395.1021407197@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200205/141 X-Sequence-Number: 7777 Mathieu Arnold writes: > I don't know how to use a 2 argument aggregate (I don't even know if it's > possible). We don't have any support for multi-argument aggregates. I don't think it's impossible to do, but it would take some hacking. regards, tom lane