Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CD2475F25 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:15:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from fzkmail2.fzk.de (fzkmail2.fzk.de [141.52.27.52]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D307A475DC0 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:15:17 -0500 (EST) Received: FROM resy5.fzk.de BY fzkmail2.fzk.de ; Tue Dec 17 15:15:20 2002 +0100 Received: œby rodos.fzk.de with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.7.1) id PAA19295 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:15:19 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <3DFF3177.3EBB9DFC@rodos.fzk.de> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:15:19 +0100 From: Christoph Haller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/780) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: join and dynamic view Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200212/204 X-Sequence-Number: 10792 > > Christoph Haller wrote: > > > Tomasz, > > Could you please point out why this is not a good idea. Thanks. > > How often do you change structure of this view? What happens when during > querying this view someone recreates it? > > What happens to your reports? Do you have them already dynamic? > Usually I create A4-paper based reports, so it is difficult to fit them > if horizontal structure changes. > > Maybe creating dynamic view is not so bad idea. I think you should > watch them carefully so they don't surprise you. > > Tomasz Myrta > Good Points. Thanks again. Regards, Christoph