Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AB4475E88
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:09:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fzkmail2.fzk.de (fzkmail2.fzk.de [141.52.27.52])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39F0D475E41
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:09:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: FROM resy5.fzk.de BY fzkmail2.fzk.de ;
 Tue Dec 17 16:09:59 2002 +0100
Received: œby rodos.fzk.de with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.7.1) id QAA19385; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:09:58 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <3DFF3E46.EDBB2EE6@rodos.fzk.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:09:58 +0100
From: Christoph Haller <ch@rodos.fzk.de>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/780)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Upgrade question - was Re: join and dynamic view
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200212/208
X-Sequence-Number: 10796

>
> That explains it - the server I'm developing on is quite old - I
didn't
> realise how old.  I'm about to do an upgrade from 7.1.3 to 7.2.1-5
over
> christmas in fact.
>
> Will I need to dump/restore the database for this upgrade?
>
I'm not sure. But I think it's never ever a bad idea to do a dump
before any kind of upgrade.
Regards, Christoph