X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59AAD475AFF for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:40:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from fzkmail2.fzk.de (fzkmail2.fzk.de [141.52.27.52]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CC7B4759BD for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:39:54 -0500 (EST) Received: FROM resy5.fzk.de BY fzkmail2.fzk.de ; Tue Feb 04 09:39:53 2003 +0100 Received: œby rodos.fzk.de with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.7.1) id JAA11700; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:39:53 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <3E3F7C59.E6C5278C@rodos.fzk.de> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 09:39:53 +0100 From: Christoph Haller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/780) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Cc: wweng@kencast.com Subject: Re: iceberg queries Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200302/73 X-Sequence-Number: 11471 > > Does PostgreSQL optimizer handle iceberg queries well? > What do you mean by "iceberg query" ? I've never heard this term. Regards, Christoph