X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9BC474E53 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 06:30:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from serwer.skawsoft.com.pl (serwer.skawsoft.com.pl [213.25.37.66]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49348474E44 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 06:30:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from klaster.net (pa194.krakow.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl [213.76.36.194]) by serwer.skawsoft.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25F62B885; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:21:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3E520F93.4000002@klaster.net> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:48:51 +0100 From: Tomasz Myrta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; PL; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Haller Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: " Adding missing FROM-clause entry for table .... " problem. References: <3E520C32.CD9C82FA@rodos.fzk.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200302/396 X-Sequence-Number: 11794 Christoph Haller wrote: > is not valid SQL syntax. What will actually happen (this is a PostgreSQL > extension to the standard) is that an implicit table > reference is added to the FROM clause, so the query is processed as if > it were written as I think this extension should be removed. I found all "Adding missing FROM..." were just results of mistake. Does anyone use this feature? What does other Postgres users think about it? Regards, Tomasz Myrta