X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1994476353
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:09:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fzkmail2.fzk.de (fzkmail2.fzk.de [141.52.27.52])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39027476390
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:09:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: FROM resy5.fzk.de BY fzkmail2.fzk.de ;
 Thu Apr 17 16:09:36 2003 +0200
Received: œby rodos.fzk.de with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.7.1) id QAA21058; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:09:36 +0200 (METDST)
Message-ID: <3E9EB59F.B01FBF60@rodos.fzk.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:09:36 +0200
From: Christoph Haller <ch@rodos.fzk.de>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/780)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, mallah@trade-india.com
Subject: Re: getting rid of "Adding missing FROM-clause entry...."
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.6 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_10,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,QUOTE_TWICE_1
	autolearn=ham	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
X-Archive-Number: 200304/267
X-Sequence-Number: 12968

> > And why are you using "limit 1 offset 0"?
>
> becuase the subquery results in mutiple rowss.
> I want the first row to update title1,fname1,mname1,lname1,degs1
>
> and use the second row by using "limit 1 offset 1" to
> update title2,fname2,mname2,lname2,degs2 etc
>
> do u still want me to try the query u gave?
> (actually i did try and its giving some trivial error)
>
No. Looks like  a misunderstanding.
Do I get it right this time assuming you want to
set up multiple update commands which update
only one row at a time?
Regards, Christoph