X-Original-To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A95C475AE4; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:31:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from snoopy.oit.edu (snoopy.OIT.EDU [140.211.135.12]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969FE474E42; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:31:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cvc.net (purvine-141-62.oit.edu [140.211.141.62]) by snoopy.oit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/OIT-4.0) with ESMTP id h3OKVkpX011059; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:31:46 -0700 Message-ID: <3EA84A9C.1040901@cvc.net> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:35:40 -0700 From: Dennis Gearon Reply-To: gearond@cvc.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Treat Cc: Josh Berkus , "pgsql-general@postgresql.org" , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [SQL] rewriting values with before trigger References: <1051201544.4753.522.camel@camel> <200304240939.54070.josh@agliodbs.com> <1051209495.7747.544.camel@camel> <3EA836AF.8060704@cvc.net> <1051212144.4752.558.camel@camel> <3EA83C95.8070404@cvc.net> <1051213745.4752.572.camel@camel> In-Reply-To: <1051213745.4752.572.camel@camel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-38.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200304/1277 X-Sequence-Number: 41342 I **LIKE** your kind of thinking :-) Don't mess up the data. Don't mess up the schema. It hurts or causes LOTS of labor later on. Robert Treat wrote: > On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 15:35, Dennis Gearon wrote: > >>Well, >> does ''::INT do anything valuable? > > > not in 7.3+, and given my original problem involves timestamps, not in > 7.2 either. > > >> change column to a string, convert to INTS on the way out, STRINGS on the way in? >> use an external language to make transitions. >> > > > yeah, I've thought of some other crazy ways to get around this, but the > problem is due to a bug in the application side. I was hoping I could > write a quick hack (like adding a rule/trigger) to get around this until > the app was fixed, but I'm not going to make my side a kludge when it > isn't one now. > > > Robert Treat > > >