X-Original-To: pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDC3D1B44B; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 06:49:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10733-04; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 02:48:16 -0400 (AST) Received: from ndl1mr1-a-fixed.sancharnet.in (ndl1mr1-a-fixed.sancharnet.in [61.0.0.45]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F84D1B447; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 02:48:14 -0400 (AST) Received: from conversion-daemon.ndl1mr1-a-fixed.sancharnet.in by ndl1mr1-a-fixed.sancharnet.in (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) id <0HQJ00I01JCOP7@ndl1mr1-a-fixed.sancharnet.in>; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 12:12:06 +0530 (IST) Received: from sancharnet.in ([61.0.95.97]) by ndl1mr1-a-fixed.sancharnet.in (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0HQJ0033IJXO8W@ndl1mr1-a-fixed.sancharnet.in>; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 12:12:06 +0530 (IST) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 12:17:06 +0530 From: Sai Hertz And Control Systems Subject: Re: [SQL] Anti log in PostgreSQL In-reply-to: <200312261934.35070.martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar> To: Martin Marques Cc: aspire420@hotpop.com, pgsql-admin@postgresql.org, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Reply-To: aspire420@hotpop.com Message-id: <3FED2AEA.70707@sancharnet.in> Organization: Sai Hertz And Control Systems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 References: <3FECB238.1050801@sancharnet.in> <200312261934.35070.martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200312/318 X-Sequence-Number: 11824 Dear Martin Marques and other kind people out their , >>In mathematics I would have written it something like >> >>A = antilog (3·3234) = 2144 >> >> > >As I can understand, this is a 10 base log, so that what you want is >10^(3.3234)? > > Though antilog did not solve my problem the link below helped me to prove my point to my bankers http://www.ilovemaths.com/3depreciation.htm http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.interest.html Thanks a load for the kind help forwarded by you all. Regards, Vishal Kashyap >For that you have the exponential operator ^. > > >