X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71188B9EA6 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:36:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62603-06 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:36:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.logi-track.com (burro.logi-track.com [213.239.193.212]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F75C8B9E87 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:36:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com (J1520.j.pppool.de [85.74.21.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.logi-track.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A173046A; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:36:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5158AAB2B8; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:36:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <421B3550.5080108@logi-track.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:36:16 +0100 From: Markus Schaber User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Ragnar_Hafsta=F0?= Cc: pginfo , Tom Lane , Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com, Michael Glaesemann , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: pg primary key bug? References: <4214B466.20908@t1.unisoftbg.com> <8125.1108661189@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4214C94F.2050806@t1.unisoftbg.com> <9340.1108664352@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4214D5C3.4070107@t1.unisoftbg.com> <9785.1108666900@sss.pgh.pa.us> <421992FE.3030108@t1.unisoftbg.com> <3293.1109026294@sss.pgh.pa.us> <421AC251.7060806@t1.unisoftbg.com> <7012.1109061770@sss.pgh.pa.us> <421AFC7F.406@t1.unisoftbg.com> <1109073162.17839.124.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1109073162.17839.124.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF0B186E0175634907E066FF7" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.053 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200502/239 X-Sequence-Number: 20350 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF0B186E0175634907E066FF7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Ragnar, Ragnar Hafsta=F0 schrieb: >>We are using jdbc (jdbc driver from pg) + jboss (java based >>application server) + connection pool (biult in jboss). >>... >>Will vacuum full generate this problem if we have locked table in this >>time? (It is possible to have locked table in theory) > I do not know if this is relevant, but I have seen jboss applications > keep sessions in 'Idle in transaction' state, apparently with some > locks granted. Would such cases not interfere with vacuum? Most of those "Idle in transaction" problems were caused by suboptimal handling of BEGIN in the pgjdbc driver, this should be fixed in current versions of postgres.jar (build 8.0-310). Markus --=20 markus schaber | dipl. informatiker logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 z=FCrich phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53 mailto:schabios@logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com --------------enigF0B186E0175634907E066FF7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCGzVROVWsnapT9i0RA7wkAJ9w3S4RfSyDXWpivnKejSb432t0qgCfctRs ZFKSSoSlMt2G1lXbAVjKa9I= =YIgt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF0B186E0175634907E066FF7--