X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767A5550E7 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:58:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04967-06 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:57:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sranda.klamovka.kosire.czf (unknown [82.113.63.66]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C80543EE for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:57:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 20555 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2005 13:57:40 +0100 Received: from startnet.klamovka.kosire.czf (HELO ?192.168.11.101?) (10.15.6.17) by ns.klamovka.kosire.czf with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Mar 2005 13:57:40 +0100 Message-ID: <42358A3F.6090400@startnet.cz> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:57:35 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Miroslav_=8Aulc?= Organization: StartNet s.r.o. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pginfo Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: lower and unicode References: <423528B6.2070407@t1.unisoftbg.com> <42354812.7030106@startnet.cz> <42355BFC.4080409@t1.unisoftbg.com> <42356AB5.1010306@startnet.cz> <42357AA0.4090303@t1.unisoftbg.com> In-Reply-To: <42357AA0.4090303@t1.unisoftbg.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080701020703060605040007" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Archive-Number: 200503/198 X-Sequence-Number: 20677 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080701020703060605040007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit pginfo wrote: > Hi, > I am using --no-locale by init db. > I readet that if I am using some locale the pg will work very slow. I don't remember reading it will be very slow. I just remember that I've read it will slow down some things (which I think is logical in this case). > Have you noticed some speed penalty by using cs_CZ.utf8. When using PostgreSQL, I need correct collating order for strings so I have no other choice. I didn't do any speed tests but I think if you need correct behaviour for your locale, you should use your locale. Just try it and you will see the results. You can then make a decision for yourself. I think you won't be the only one using locale for your database ;-) > regards, > ivan. Miroslav --------------080701020703060605040007 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name="miroslav.sulc.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="miroslav.sulc.vcf" begin:vcard fn;quoted-printable:Miroslav =C5=A0ulc n;quoted-printable:=C5=A0ulc;Miroslav org:StartNet s.r.o. adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:;;Vrchlick=C3=A9ho 161/5;Praha 5;;150 00;=C4=8Cesk=C3=A1 republika email;internet:miroslav.sulc@startnet.cz title:CEO tel;work:+420 257 225 602 tel;cell:+420 603 711 413 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.startnet.cz version:2.1 end:vcard --------------080701020703060605040007--