X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1293BDA72E for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:47:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45033-02 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:47:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp105.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp105.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.169.225]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D97C3DAEEE for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:47:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 11394 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2005 13:47:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=Yahoo.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QYXR+9e3DnsFZPrhVPzR11lKVFUWgo/uVe1yqzPUbgebcBMK3Wr0/ktAhSx11WMjHV4sDiXirYGyPCuRuep2JdQYejFmbOe0tF0ZQMNPMvnHlJSekIlCXeXRZ8ZlxWsv4OfNgIwJb/vldIj8zJp3lF7FU7orKIZ4FJkZOz3j5ug= ; Received: from unknown (HELO jupiter.black-lion.info) (janwieck@68.80.245.191 with login) by smtp105.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2005 13:47:21 -0000 Received: from [172.21.8.23] (ismtp.afilias.com [216.217.55.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by jupiter.black-lion.info (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j9RDlK1o035607; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:47:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from JanWieck@Yahoo.com) Message-ID: <4360DA65.6010601@Yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:47:17 -0400 From: Jan Wieck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mario.splivalo@mobart.hr Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: why vacuum References: <200510261015.17623.lawgon@thenilgiris.com> <1130339980.2872.12.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <435FAA21.3070400@Yahoo.com> <1130401371.31435.17.camel@ekim> In-Reply-To: <1130401371.31435.17.camel@ekim> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.013 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.013] X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200510/366 X-Sequence-Number: 23219 On 10/27/2005 4:22 AM, Mario Splivalo wrote: > On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:09 -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: >> > >> >> You must have missed the FAQ and other side notes about replication in >> the MySQL manual. Essentially MySQL replication is nothing but a query >> duplicating system, with the added sugar of taking care of now() and >> some other non-deterministic things, but not all of them. >> >> Non-deterministic user defined procedures, functions and triggers will >> simply blow MySQL's sophisticated replication apart. >> > > That is just not true. I haven't tried MySQL 4 and above, but in 3.5.x > replication wos working as expected, and the load that replication posed > was insignificant. The only TRUE problem was that replication was > unidirectional. That SAME problem has Slony, and other 'replication > systems' available for postgres. Read again. "Non-deterministic user defined procedures ...". Please give me *ONE* example of a user defined procedure in 3.5.x at all. You must have missed the point that stored procedures are a new feature in 5.0. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #