X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A852347622E
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed,  9 Apr 2003 00:47:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A5F476227
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed,  9 Apr 2003 00:47:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h394lS2L004380;
	Wed, 9 Apr 2003 00:47:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: Rudi Starcevic <rudi@oasis.net.au>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: CASE 
In-reply-to: <3E93579A.3030006@oasis.net.au> 
References: <3E928853.7090801@oasis.net.au>
	<20030408094039.GS1712@pirmabanka.lv>
	<877ka519e0.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv> <26705.1049812237@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<3E93579A.3030006@oasis.net.au>
Comments: In-reply-to Rudi Starcevic <rudi@oasis.net.au>
	message dated "Wed, 09 Apr 2003 09:13:30 +1000"
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 00:47:28 -0400
Message-ID: <4379.1049863648@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.5 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham	version=2.50
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
X-Archive-Number: 200304/125
X-Sequence-Number: 12826

Rudi Starcevic <rudi@oasis.net.au> writes:
> However there is one event which is in the past '2003-04-01' which is 
> still coming up as 'events' instead of 'noevents'.

But you're grouping over members and venues, and taking the max across
event dates in each group.  A past event for a venue won't affect
anything, if there are later events for that venue.

			regards, tom lane