From Premsun@nsasia.co.th Tue Dec 13 12:10:39 2005 X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8FD9DC85C for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:10:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44709-04 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:10:41 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: delayed 03:15:15.161244 by SQLgrey- Received: from svr2.postgresql.org (svr2.postgresql.org [65.19.161.25]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17BC9DC84B for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:10:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.nsasia.co.th (mail.nsasia.co.th [203.146.6.34]) by svr2.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B827BF0B92 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:55:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.200.39] (helo=mail.nsasia.co.th) by astaro.nsasia.co.th with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Em5wH-00035p-IN for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:55:15 +0700 Received: from Thailand-MTA by mail.nsasia.co.th with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:54:59 +0700 Message-Id: <439EEEC9.C5F7.004C.0@nsasia.co.th> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:54:49 +0700 From: "Premsun Choltanwanich" To: Subject: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=__Part7052A049.0__=" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200512/96 X-Sequence-Number: 23638 This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to properly handle MIME multipart messages. --=__Part7052A049.0__= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear All, =20 I use '$libdir/lo' for manage my Large Object for PostgreSQL 8.0.4 . Now I = try to up my PostgreSQL to new version as 8.1.1 but I think I got some = error about lo (Large Object). =20 lo (Large Object) function that normally shown in function list now = disappear. I'm sure that I already check on Large Object box when I = install. I found some information on http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/int= eractive/lo-interfaces.html#AEN26978 about lo function. PostgreSQL has = many new lo function that I never use in version 8.0.4 and some function I = have use is not found (lo_in , lo_out). =20 Could you please advise me how to manage lo (Large Object) in PostgreSQL = 8.1.1? (Normally I use VB6 as develop tool.) And I'm not sure about my old lo (Large Object) data. How can I restore it = for use in PostgreSQL 8.1.1? =20 Thank you --=__Part7052A049.0__= Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: HTML
Dear All,
 
I use '$libdir/lo' for manage my Large Object for PostgreSQL = 8.0.4 . Now I try to up my PostgreSQL to new version as 8.1.1 but I think = I got some error about lo (Large Object).
 
lo (Large Object) function that normally shown in function list = now disappear.  I'm sure that I already check on Large Object = box  when I install. I found some information on http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/lo-interfaces.html#= AEN26978 about lo function. PostgreSQL has many new lo function = that I never use in version 8.0.4 and some function I have use is not = found (lo_in , lo_out).
 
Could you please advise me how to manage lo (Large Object) in = PostgreSQL 8.1.1? (Normally I use VB6 as develop tool.)
And I'm not sure about my old lo (Large Object) data. How can I = restore it for use in PostgreSQL 8.1.1?
 
Thank you
--=__Part7052A049.0__=-- From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Tue Dec 13 15:40:24 2005 X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E859DC819 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:40:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87273-01 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:40:28 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0CE9DC817 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:40:21 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBDFdBcq006593; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:39:11 -0500 (EST) To: "Premsun Choltanwanich" cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 In-reply-to: <439EEEC9.C5F7.004C.0@nsasia.co.th> References: <439EEEC9.C5F7.004C.0@nsasia.co.th> Comments: In-reply-to "Premsun Choltanwanich" message dated "Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:54:49 +0700" Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:39:11 -0500 Message-ID: <6592.1134488351@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.003] X-Spam-Score: 0.003 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200512/97 X-Sequence-Number: 23639 "Premsun Choltanwanich" writes: > lo (Large Object) function that normally shown in function list now = > disappear. I'm sure that I already check on Large Object box when I = > install. I found some information on http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/int= > eractive/lo-interfaces.html#AEN26978 about lo function. PostgreSQL has = > many new lo function that I never use in version 8.0.4 and some function I = > have use is not found (lo_in , lo_out). lo_in/lo_out aren't needed anymore because lo isn't a separate type, just a domain over OID. Why were you using them directly, anyway? regards, tom lane From Premsun@nsasia.co.th Wed Dec 14 07:04:02 2005 X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE57E9DC8AA for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:04:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77593-08 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:04:02 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: delayed 03:07:39.804402 by SQLgrey- Received: from svr2.postgresql.org (svr2.postgresql.org [65.19.161.25]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7179DC84D for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:03:59 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.nsasia.co.th (mail.nsasia.co.th [203.146.6.34]) by svr2.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ED4F0B42 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:56:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.200.39] (helo=mail.nsasia.co.th) by astaro.nsasia.co.th with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmNkW-0005Oa-Pf for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:56:18 +0700 Received: from Thailand-MTA by mail.nsasia.co.th with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:56:07 +0700 Message-Id: <439FFA3F.C5F7.004C.0@nsasia.co.th> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:56:01 +0700 From: "Premsun Choltanwanich" To: "Tom Lane" Cc: Subject: Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 References: <439EEEC9.C5F7.004C.0@nsasia.co.th><439EEEC9.C5F7.004C.0@nsasia.co.th> <6592.1134488351@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <6592.1134488351@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=__PartE2C033C1.0__=" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200512/109 X-Sequence-Number: 23651 This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to properly handle MIME multipart messages. --=__PartE2C033C1.0__= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Tom, =20 I'm not sure that I understand your word correctly. But I will explain = more information =20 I just need to keep my member's picture into database for showing and may = have update sometime. I code my program with VB6. I found some suggestion = to manage lo about lo_in and lo_out that why. =20 What thing I need to do for continue using lo on PostgreSQL 8.1.1 =20 Ragards, =20 Premsun >>> Tom Lane 12/13/2005 22:39:11 >>> "Premsun Choltanwanich" writes: > lo (Large Object) function that normally shown in function list now =3D > disappear. I'm sure that I already check on Large Object box when I = =3D > install. I found some information on http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/i= nt=3D > eractive/lo-interfaces.html#AEN26978 about lo function. PostgreSQL has = =3D > many new lo function that I never use in version 8.0.4 and some function = I =3D > have use is not found (lo_in , lo_out). lo_in/lo_out aren't needed anymore because lo isn't a separate type, just a domain over OID. Why were you using them directly, anyway? regards, tom lane --=__PartE2C033C1.0__= Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: HTML
Dear Tom,
 
I'm not sure that I understand your word correctly.   But I = will explain more information
 
I just need to keep my member's picture into database for showing = ;and may have update sometime. I code my program with VB6. I found some = suggestion to manage lo about lo_in and lo_out that why.
 
What thing I need to do for continue using lo on PostgreSQL 8.1.1
 
Ragards,
 
Premsun

>>> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 12/13/2005 = 22:39:11 >>>
"Premsun Choltanwanich" <Premsun@nsasia.co.th&g= t; writes:
> lo (Large Object) function that normally shown in = function list now =3D
> disappear.  I'm sure that I already = check on Large Object box  when I =3D
> install. I found some = information on http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/int=3D
> eractive/l= o-interfaces.html#AEN26978 about lo function. PostgreSQL has =3D
> = many new lo function that I never use in version 8.0.4 and some function I = =3D
> have use is not found (lo_in , lo_out).

lo_in/lo_out = aren't needed anymore because lo isn't a separate type,
just a domain = over OID.  Why were you using them directly, anyway?

regards, = tom lane
--=__PartE2C033C1.0__=--