X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9729DC98B for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:58:45 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36921-05 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:58:45 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from outbound.internet-mail-service.net (outbound6.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.197]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA779DC8DF for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:58:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by outbound.internet-mail-service.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E46240FD8 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:58:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (adsl-69-107-112-198.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [69.107.112.198]) by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1F6whkU012950 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:58:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bryce1@obviously.com) Message-ID: <43F26226.1050203@obviously.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:05:10 -0800 From: Bryce Nesbitt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050921 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Non Matching Records in Two Tables References: <20060214210829.79695.qmail@web54302.mail.yahoo.com> <1139952295.3083.67.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1139952295.3083.67.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.487 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.259, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=0.746] X-Spam-Score: 0.487 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200602/163 X-Sequence-Number: 24173 Ken Hill wrote: >> also (hate to be obvious) have you analyzed lately? >> I'd say that's fair game, not obvious. Vacuum/Analyze is ar so aparent to a person moving to Postgres from other DB's.