X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B3D9DC863
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:20:57 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 56742-06
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:20:58 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from mail.logix-tt.com (unknown [212.211.145.186])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD999DCBC6
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:20:52 -0400 (AST)
Received: from kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (T938b.t.pppool.de
	[89.55.147.139])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99745656CD;
	Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:21:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F19184ED71E;
	Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:21:05 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4427E6C1.1000401@logix-tt.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:21:05 +0200
From: Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
Organization: Logical Tracking and Tracing International AG, Switzerland
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: PostGIS Users Discussion <postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL SQL List <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] Problem using set-returning functions
References: <35F9812087218F47B050D41D1B58298B86D2F7@dnd5.dnd.boston.cob>
In-Reply-To: <35F9812087218F47B050D41D1B58298B86D2F7@dnd5.dnd.boston.cob>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.104 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.104]
X-Spam-Score: 0.104
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200603/412
X-Sequence-Number: 24758

Hi, Regina,

Obe, Regina DND\MIS wrote:

> generate_series works I think because it is a special case - it isn't
> really a set function even though it behaves that way sortof.

Well, dump() works as well, and it is no build-in.

As a recent thread here stated, it is how set returning functions are
expected to work as long as "adjacent tables" are not implemented.

http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-sql@postgresql.org/msg20545.html


Thanks,
Markus

-- 
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf.     | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org