Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AA59FB3FE for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:45:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87676-05 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:44:57 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mail.logix-tt.com (mail.logix-tt.com [212.211.145.186]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123689FB37B for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:44:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (p549D1602.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.157.22.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B32665997; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:47:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kingfisher.intern.logix-tt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D32218818CDE; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:44:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4523D6F1.9030504@logix-tt.com> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:44:49 +0200 From: Markus Schaber Reply-To: PostgreSQL SQL List Organization: Logical Tracking and Tracing International AG, Switzerland User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Cc: christopher wood Subject: Re: Assigning a timestamp without timezone to a timestamp References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.204 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_1, AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/42 X-Sequence-Number: 26431 Hi, Christopher, christopher wood wrote: > But I can't even take credit for that, my business partner suggested > using Postgres. So I guess he's a smart one, too. :-) At least as long as he understands that free software does not mean a TCO of zero dollars, that's the main mistake when businesses try to jump on the free software train. > I have been a DB2 DBA most of my professional life (25 years) until > recently, and a huge proponent of DB2 against the likes of Oracle and > MS-SQL. DB2 is not the worst one, AFAICT. And as a long-time DBA, you know that administration of a real DBMS is not "install and forget", but lots of fine-tuning and ongoing care. > So far I am very impressed with Postgres but there is a lot more in > Postgres to get one's head around. I certainly appreciate having people > like you and Andrew to help me along. PostgreSQL is neither perfect, nor a one-fits-all solution. (Hey, that's the reason for loads of individuals and companies to develop new releases and extensions, after all. :-) But it's a stable DBMS providing most features one would expect and use, and it has a very supportive community, and commercial supporters and niche-derivates. As long as you want to keep learning, and don't hesitate getting involved, PostgreSQL will offer you a satisfying experience. Regards, Markus -- Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org