DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=rrae/dXyUIUKcWpNnW6RLk7SI+whLlfST/OMmj5NZW+HhcwQzafXI4T/HMq/zTLX+CcxAJZvFwcA0/60x/8FgTlovWp9a7jIq6XxeifgwY8tc2VhFHGFcnXZqI/Rz6I6+GItJKeWgSPttrHeyrktBVhREXfG5L04jO7A+RF4D+Q=
Message-ID: <46D82EFE.3030402@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:08:46 +0400
From: Aleksandr Vinokurov <aleksandr.vin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
CC: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Incomprehensible dogged sort in Merge Join
References: <46D82318.3070700@gmail.com> <24061.1188571419@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<46D82B86.6060600@gmail.com> <20070831150321.GA8046@alvh.no-ip.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070831150321.GA8046@alvh.no-ip.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Aleksandr Vinokurov escribió:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
>>> When criticizing planner deficiencies, it's considered polite to use
>>> something that's less than two major releases back ;-)
>> Sorry, it was blown out from my head at the end of composing: my version is 
>> 8.0.1, not so old, IMHO.
> 
> It _is_ quite old, yes.  Try 8.2 at the very least, but in some cases
> you're going to get "current CVS HEAD does it better", so if you want to
> suggest improvements to the planner you should be really looking into
> that.
> 

I understood my fault :)

Guys, please forgive my dodge.
Aleksandr.