Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725742E002F for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:57:00 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73837-02 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:56:57 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: delayed 00:23:56.269269 by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from smtpauth.rollernet.us (smtpauth.rollernet.us [208.11.75.5]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0B82E002C for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:56:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from smtpauth.rollernet.us (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtpauth.rollernet.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F631594013 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:32:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from iron.denterprises.org (ool-4350518d.dyn.optonline.net [67.80.81.141]) by smtpauth.rollernet.us (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:32:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from lamp.iron.denterprises.org (lamp.iron.denterprises.org [192.168.171.84]) by iron.denterprises.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611E816767D for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:32:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47C33412.8030800@denterprises.org> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:33:06 -0500 From: Colin Wetherbee User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Bouncing replies [was: SQL standards in Mysql] References: <47BF1B32.2050800@kensystem.com> <20080222195720.GL9392@alvh.no-ip.org> <47BF794C.1030004@ultimeth.com> <47C32E37.8070602@ultimeth.com> In-Reply-To: <47C32E37.8070602@ultimeth.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rollernet-Abuse: Processed by Roller Network Mail Services. Contact abuse@rollernet.us to report violations. Abuse policy: http://rollernet.us/abuse.php X-Rollernet-Submit: Submit ID 7152.47c3340b.5baf9.0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200802/184 X-Sequence-Number: 30275 Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote: > On 2008-02-22 21:34, Scott Marlowe wrote: > >> Bouncing messages from a public list is kinda rude. >> > No more so, than sending two copies of your reply to me, because you > don't go up to your mailer's "To:" line and manually delete the extra > address (as I do on EVERY reply I send to this list). This is twice in as many days my old iLamp mail machine has been set aflame by the fires of a heated discussion about how a mailing list's reply-to is set. It gets hot enough just running Thunderbird. If you're going to continue this off-topic discussion, might I suggest taking it off-list? Interestingly, yesterday's flame-war took place because someone was adamant about just the opposite of your argument. Colin