Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6EA634A80 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:16:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83288-08 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:16:18 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.233]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E0B634A2A for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:16:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so601353rvb.43 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:16:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=itSL0/trjdE+x9fZG9Ob5zKPtFl1qeYMGFyRWyygC4Y=; b=poQDgbqhpeNT8MDzIKj8WAeHLkBber8xmd6FD5DOb1tTdxrYIbJD4F6Y2FyR15bEuR tqNtK9O1+VBR1UEzNRKyygr7OeoFlZSCjE+N+AhUSSB7yw5k7OnNR4brxZrgb3uf6Qy1 xmnb83F/kIOCEPmDMhw3fBAr4rb04Q64ojEMc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TqW7KNLu73ljUZYPLh+wkBvn7iECrACKMEQHLZvhQ0V782V9JePG3GFTgPvIrOymmE dZtUiGXMmMkq2UluQ5d7oyvd7yQ8QVrVdHfZYSqoAnM699Y0Z0BBFn/4kiXr549IHgql Ea5xRtCDitzji3bYNWd5baSN1J/rx1xoNyOxI= Received: by 10.141.154.8 with SMTP id g8mr2359084rvo.8.1244762183704; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?172.16.1.231? ([208.187.158.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c20sm1771944rvf.30.2009.06.11.16.16.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A31904E.4010600@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:16:30 -0600 From: Rob Sargent User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: polymorphic function in 7.4 vs. 8.3 References: <200906111442.17861.richrosenberg@earthlink.net> <20491.1244756986@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200906111602.48353.richrosenberg@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <200906111602.48353.richrosenberg@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.29 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=-1.290, MISSING_HEADERS=1.581 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200906/60 X-Sequence-Number: 32665 Richard Rosenberg wrote: > On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:49:46 Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Sure you can't move the DB off 7.4? There would be pretty considerable >> benefits from adopting some recent release instead. >> >> regards, tom lane >> > > Don't I know it. I am SOL as the machine is hosted/shared out by an external > provider. I can do it by getting rid of the polymorphism - breaking the > columns into separate args - as you say: > Hmm. Some subliminal coercion seems in order here. "Gee I hope it doesn't leek out that is so poorly run that they're stuck on postgres 7.4 with no hope of ever catching up with the rest of the world"....