Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96D0633C0F for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:27:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23622-04-2 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:27:34 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BCF633662 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:27:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1MTIBz-0005oW-7w; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:27:51 -0600 Received: from [208.187.158.94] (helo=[172.16.1.221]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MTIBh-0001gC-LD; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:27:34 -0600 Message-ID: <4A65EC7A.8010003@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:27:38 -0600 From: Rob Sargent User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-XM-SPF: eid=; ; ; mid=; ; ; hst=in01.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=208.187.158.94; ; ; frm=robjsargent@gmail.com; ; ; spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 208.187.158.94 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, robjsargent@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: robjsargent@gmail.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;pgsql-sql@postgresql.org X-Spam-Relay-Country: Subject: Order of operations in ascii vs archive format (moderately urgent) X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:26:12 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.27 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.270 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200907/91 X-Sequence-Number: 32832 Is there a difference in the order of execution between an ascii dump and one using the "custom" format? Or any difference in the general operation? I need to know if I can rely on the ascii version to tell me what the custom format might have done.