Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6B5632E8E for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 05:47:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71867-07 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 08:47:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from moon.antora.ru (moon.antora.ru [89.111.189.180]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1741B632E59 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 05:47:50 -0300 (ADT) Envelope-to: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Received: from moon.inner.space ([10.1.1.5] helo=moon.antora.ru) by moon.antora.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1OWmlo-0003e3-93 for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:47:48 +0400 Received: from [192.168.1.6] [94.233.222.172] by moon.antora.ru (Axigen) with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 0C461D; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 12:47:47 +0400 Message-ID: <4C3590B3.6000709@bankir.ru> Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:47:47 +0400 From: silly sad User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: References: <4C3177B8.3080803@bankir.ru> <4C317D82.7020702@bankir.ru> <4C318226.3040701@bankir.ru> <4C318583.60306@bankir.ru> <4C3189B5.1090906@bankir.ru> <4C336D73.2000105@magwerks.com> <4C340A00.5020201@bankir.ru> <4C3490B4.6060903@magwerks.com> <4C357EEE.9000406@bankir.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_50=0.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201007/45 X-Sequence-Number: 34358 On 07/08/10 11:38, Dave Page wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, silly sad wrote: >> On 07/07/10 18:35, Justin Graf wrote: >>> >>> On 7/7/2010 12:00 AM, silly sad wrote: >>>> >>>> On 07/06/10 21:52, Justin Graf wrote: >>>> >>>>> I wrote an article covering this on the wiki >>>>> >>>>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/BinaryFilesInDB >>>>> >>>> there are some "red flags" in communication >>>> (particularly reading papers) >>>> one of them is "binary data" which ITSELF IS NONSENCE. >>>> >>> >>> WHAT??????? >>> >>> You do understand that if you don't like it you can spend time fixing it. >> >> fix what? human minds of so-called programmers? > > That is not appropriate behaviour for the PostgreSQL mailing lists. > Please treat others with respect, even if you disagree with them. i do not disagree. i only meant a fixing of human communication problem is out of my hand.