Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E1B47651A for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 01:58:51 -0400 (EDT) Mailbox-Line: From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Thu Jul 4 01:58:51 2002 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71ECF476290 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 01:34:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g645Xv200505; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 01:33:57 -0400 (EDT) To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Jie Liang , PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [SQL] pg_restore cannot restore function In-reply-to: <200207040303.g6433Dv17097@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <200207040303.g6433Dv17097@candle.pha.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Wed, 03 Jul 2002 23:03:13 -0400" Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 01:33:57 -0400 Message-ID: <502.1025760837@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,X_NOT_PRESENT version=2.30 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200207/30 X-Sequence-Number: 4208 Bruce Momjian writes: > The following patch fixes all of these, and it will be in 7.3. It will? Kindly explain what the heck this is doing. It looks to me like it will probably break more cases than it fixes. AFAICS it's just completely muddying the waters about what is quoted and what isn't ... regards, tom lane