Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B235B9FB7B9
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:56:47 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 56789-03 for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:56:41 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from smtp1.yandex.ru (smtp1.yandex.ru [213.180.223.87])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9416C9FB58A
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:56:41 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from [82.209.238.118] ([82.209.238.118]:32275 "EHLO asup_tur"
	smtp-auth: "sql4-en" TLS-CIPHER: <none> TLS-PEER-CN1: <none>)
	by mail.yandex.ru with ESMTP id S2077351AbXDTP40 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:56:26 +0400
X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at smtp1.yandex.ru logged sender identity as:
	sql4-en
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:59:23 +0300
From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@narod.ru>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.01) Personal
Reply-To: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@narod.ru>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <5239525468.20070420185923@narod.ru>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Fwd: Re[2]: We all are looped on Internet: request + transport =
	invariant
In-Reply-To: <7939450187.20070420185808@narod.ru>
References: <14110647859.20070413105812@narod.ru>
	<20070413150936.GA31517@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
	<1684192906.20070419090827@narod.ru>
	<20070419134808.GB14187@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
	<814860828.20070420120819@narod.ru>  <4628A08F.9050804@archonet.com>
	<1177072978.760.40.camel@pampa> <7939450187.20070420185808@narod.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.342 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=-0.298,
	BAYES_50=0.001, URIBL_SBL=1.639
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Archive-Number: 200704/189
X-Sequence-Number: 28189

>have you written a TML parser

No.
I want, that you and other people help me in that.

>do you have feedback from actual average users,
>that TML is indeed easier to use than SQL?

Yes.
TML was born in discuss with these users
(mainly nucleus physicists, optics , molecular biologists, zoologist
and ecologist)

>scheme apparently requires, that tables be defined in a special way

No.
Table must be created in traditional way (by "create table, alter
table") and not through browser.
User must use "create table", etc in database-terminal like "psql.exe".

> you'll be better off discussing this in comp.databases.theory

There are two reason to discuss TML in this forum:
1. postgres is my favorite database,
2. discussion not in theory forum, but in forum of real database
approach to realization in greater degree.


Dmitry Turin
http://html6.by.ru
http://sql4.by.ru