X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E86FD1B7BE
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:02:13 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 68550-10
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Mon, 14 Jun 2004 19:02:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905C9D1B48C
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:02:08 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5EJ23Pp005368;
	Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:02:03 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Alexander M. Pravking" <fduch@antar.bryansk.ru>
Cc: Eric Lemes <eric.lemes@zanthus.com.br>, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: RES: Datetime problem 
In-reply-to: <20040614171054.GB92544@dyatel.antar.bryansk.ru> 
References: <164.1087224965@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<AIEBKHHFIIDLBADEGCPDCEKLCAAA.eric.lemes@zanthus.com.br>
	<20040614171054.GB92544@dyatel.antar.bryansk.ru>
Comments: In-reply-to "Alexander M. Pravking" <fduch@antar.bryansk.ru>
	message dated "Mon, 14 Jun 2004 21:10:54 +0400"
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:02:03 -0400
Message-ID: <5367.1087239723@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200406/120
X-Sequence-Number: 18065

"Alexander M. Pravking" <fduch@antar.bryansk.ru> writes:
> Hmm, 7.3 and 7.4 docs say that it returns timestamp (WITHOUT time zone
> is default since 7.3 IIRC), but in fact it accepts and returns timestamp
> WITH time zone. This is probably a documentation bug...

Yeah, it is.  Fixed in CVS tip --- thanks for pointing it out.

			regards, tom lane