X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9020514B2876 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:21:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48950-10 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:21:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.240]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBB614B2825 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:21:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w41so79763cwb for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.116.35 with SMTP id o35mr124041cwc; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <578aa3f7040811132151bb6f41@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:21:09 -0500 From: Thomas Seeber To: PostgreSQL Subject: Wierd Error on update Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/95 X-Sequence-Number: 18592 Hi All, I am relative PostGres newbie, so if there is a simple answer to this question, please feel free to send me a link or explaination. I am running Postgres 7.3 on a intel Linux Redhat 7.3 base. I am getting two errors which are a bit confounding. ERROR: pg_class_aclcheck:relation 474653086 not found on one table within a large SQL file update (+5000 lines with documentation) that needs to be run from the command line. Both statements are multiline Update statements. This is straight SQL, not function code. Now I can guareentee that the queries refer to an existing table, but the table is being rebuilt in the core of the long SQL update. The table in question now has all permissions (my attempt to get fixed, but that did not help). Interesting aspect to this problem is that if your run the large update in one file, and then run the two update statements in a second file it works fine. Now I placed the erroring statements at the end of the large file to make sure it was not a ordering error, but that didnt help. Any ideas? Thank you Thomas Seeber