X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2F45E46CB for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:22:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08440-09 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:22:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.240]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694AE5E46DD for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:22:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w67so15238cwb for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:22:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.117.21 with SMTP id p21mr31416cwc; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:22:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <578aa3f704081309222548a2e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:21:53 -0500 From: Thomas Seeber Reply-To: Thomas Seeber To: Tom Lane Subject: Re: Wierd Error on update Cc: PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: <20891.1092264526@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <578aa3f7040811132151bb6f41@mail.gmail.com> <20891.1092264526@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/120 X-Sequence-Number: 18617 > Original 7.3 release, or (I hope) 7.3.something? Red Hat 7.3.2.96-113 Linux Version 2.4.20-20.7custom from cat /proc/version > > I am getting two errors which are a bit confounding. > > ERROR: pg_class_aclcheck:relation 474653086 not found > > Are there any views involved? No views. Is the statement invoking any functions? The statement is not invoking any fuctions However heres the statements, UPDATE school_info_l SET ind_default_data = 't'; UPDATE school_info_l SET sis_system_id = 9 where school_id IN (492, 434, 436); which are amazingly simple. Both queries return the same exact error, same error. not your > How about triggers? Foreign keys? Rules? Neither of the updates touch any rules. sis_system_id has a foreign key constaint to another table that does in it contain a value of 9 for sis_system_id in that table, but the first isnt touching anything that has a trigger or foreign key constraint attached to the column. The table school_info_l has many contraints that affect other tables however > Also, is it always the same number in the error, or does that change > from run to run? The number is the same for each time I run the update file on the same database. with this two queries having the same error. Same result to, if I run these two after the first update file finishes there is no problem, but if I try to run it at the end of hte first file, choke. Very Odd problem to me, since the update statemenets are so simple. -Tom