X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E584AD1BA51 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:50:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23564-03 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:50:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C8FD1B9D3 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:50:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7MCoF5H005976; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:50:15 -0400 (EDT) To: Bertrand Petit Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: "SELECT IN" Still Broken in 7.4b In-reply-to: <20030822083232.C81672@memo.frmug.org> References: <18608.1061411539@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20030822083232.C81672@memo.frmug.org> Comments: In-reply-to Bertrand Petit message dated "Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:32:32 +0200" Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:50:15 -0400 Message-ID: <5975.1061556615@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200308/272 X-Sequence-Number: 14888 Bertrand Petit writes: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:32:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> against actual elapsed time (cf psql's \timing option) would tell. > What is measured by the \timing option? Elapsed time ... as seen by the client, of course. > The figures reported > are slightly larger than those loged when the log_duration parameter > is true. Yeah, that's what I'd expect, especially if there is a network hop involved. regards, tom lane