X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413DA52914 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:02:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44432-04 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 04:01:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F1F528E0 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:01:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5941uJk006339; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 00:01:56 -0400 (EDT) To: "Dmitri Bichko" Cc: "Sql-Postgre" Subject: Re: Indices and user defined operators In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to "Dmitri Bichko" message dated "Wed, 08 Jun 2005 22:23:42 -0400" Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 00:01:56 -0400 Message-ID: <6338.1118289716@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.006 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200506/125 X-Sequence-Number: 21726 "Dmitri Bichko" writes: > So, is there any way to make these operators use an index defined as > above? If you've set things up so that the operators are defined by inline-able SQL functions, I'd sort of expect it to fall out for free ... regards, tom lane