In-Reply-To: <200706261019.17026.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
References: <467FFEF9.5050603@joshuaneil.com>
	<4680B4CB.1010404@herakles.homelinux.org>
	<200706261019.17026.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <71E4A0E1-5FD5-4216-A75D-D66C059708B7@seespotcode.net>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>
Subject: Re: yet another simple SQL question
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:56:30 -0500
To: Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>


On Jun 26, 2007, at 2:19 , Achilleas Mantzios wrote:

> =CE=A3=CF=84=CE=B9=CF=82 =CE=A4=CF=81=CE=AF=CF=84=CE=B7 26 =
=CE=99=CE=BF=CF=8D=CE=BD=CE=B9=CE=BF=CF=82 2007 09:40, =CE=BF/=CE=B7 =
John =20
> Summerfield =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5:
>>
>> Subjects such as yours don't cut the mustard. Try to summarise your
>> problem; if I'm interested in the problem then I will read it and
>> (maybe) help.
>>
>> When I find it's cross-posted, I'm likely to change my mind.
>
> Why do you think that criticizing was better than staying silent?
> Anyway, Joshua already took some very enlightening answers enuf to =20
> get him
> going.

While self-admittedly grumpy, I believe John was trying to encourage =20
better posting behavior from Joshua which will benefit him by =20
receiving more answers. If John had remained silent (as I'm sure =20
others who share his sentiment have), being (apparently) new, Joshua =20
probably wouldn't know he's potentially limiting the number of =20
answers he'd receive. Perhaps John could have phrased his email =20
differently, but I think he was trying to help Joshua.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net