X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23037474E53
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:50:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2HKoWub008270;
	Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:50:32 -0500 (EST)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: btree_gist, gint4_union 
In-reply-to: <200303171959.h2HJxkN20021@candle.pha.pa.us> 
References: <200303171959.h2HJxkN20021@candle.pha.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
	message dated "Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:59:46 -0500"
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:50:32 -0500
Message-ID: <8269.1047934232@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200303/419
X-Sequence-Number: 12458

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I am confused by your question.  It seems it is declared as returning an
> int.

I suspect that all of the GiST union methods should be declared to
return 'internal', but Oleg or Teodor would probably know better.

			regards, tom lane