Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5669FB7EA
	for <pgsql-general-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:13:19 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 00365-01-8 for
	<pgsql-general-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:13:09 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FF39FBDB7
	for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:13:09 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2LGD7gs008459;
	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:13:07 -0400 (EDT)
To: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Anyone still using the sql_inheritance parameter? 
In-reply-to: <460152B1.8040101@cox.net> 
References: <28097.1174488581@sss.pgh.pa.us> <460152B1.8040101@cox.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
	message dated "Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:43:45 -0500"
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:13:06 -0400
Message-ID: <8458.1174493586@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200703/1244
X-Sequence-Number: 111433

Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
> On 03/21/07 09:49, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Is anybody still using the ability to set sql_inheritance to OFF?

> Shouldn't features be deprecated for a version before removal?

Effectively, that feature's been deprecated since 7.1 ...

			regards, tom lane