X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235ACD1C4E3
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:49:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 23417-04
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:47:52 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from news.hub.org (unknown [64.117.224.194])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A441D1C4CD
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:49:14 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from news.hub.org (host-64-117-224-194.altec1.com [64.117.224.194]
	(may be forged))
	by news.hub.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7DDn5em096846
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:49:09 GMT
	(envelope-from news@news.hub.org)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by news.hub.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7DDPjRh089769
	for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:25:45 GMT
From: proghome@silesky.com (krystoffff)
X-Newsgroups: comp.databases.postgresql.sql
Subject: Re: Error message with a SQL function
Date: 13 Aug 2003 06:25:34 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <85898f7e.0308130525.70767eb2@posting.google.com>
References: <85898f7e.0308080613.6cfb3e7c@posting.google.com>
	<5657.1060442180@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200308/156
X-Sequence-Number: 14772

Thanks

You were right, it was because of the return void
But I think in the documentation, I read somewhere that this kind of
return was allowed ... I must have mistaken ...