X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83935329C63 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:33:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13520-10 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:33:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from stark.xeocode.com (gsstark.mtl.istop.com [66.11.160.162]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4571329CE3 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:33:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=stark.xeocode.com) by stark.xeocode.com with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1C5nOc-000826-00; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:33:06 -0400 To: Tom Lane Cc: Greg Stark , Theo Galanakis , "'Josh Berkus'" , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Isnumeric function? References: <82E30406384FFB44AFD1012BAB230B55037D0591@shiva.au.lpint.net> <871xhatyhp.fsf@stark.xeocode.com> <87sm9qsj2d.fsf@stark.xeocode.com> <18533.1094824775@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <18533.1094824775@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Greg Stark Organization: The Emacs Conspiracy; member since 1992 Date: 10 Sep 2004 11:33:05 -0400 Message-ID: <87mzzyrvf2.fsf@stark.xeocode.com> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/75 X-Sequence-Number: 18921 Tom Lane writes: > Greg Stark writes: > > That's all well and good. But when I tried to make a version of your > > situation that used a function I found it doesn't work so well with > > functional indexes: > > ... > > I can't figure out why this is happening. > > You're using 7.3 or older? 7.4.3. -- greg