Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0D74760BF for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 22:05:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A780E475DD0 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 22:04:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g4I24SW00891; Fri, 17 May 2002 22:04:28 -0400 (EDT) To: josh@agliodbs.com Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL TODO In-reply-to: <200205171719.38290.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200205171719.38290.josh@agliodbs.com> Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus message dated "Fri, 17 May 2002 17:19:38 -0700" Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 22:04:27 -0400 Message-ID: <888.1021687467@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200205/191 X-Sequence-Number: 7826 Josh Berkus writes: > I was just checking the TODO list and noticed that none of my suggestions or > John Proctors suggestions regarding PL/pgSQL improvements had made it on to > the list. Is this because our ideas have been rejected, or because nobody > has time to deal with the TODO list? Bruce normally maintains the TODO list, and he's been on vacation all this month (won't be back till June 1, I believe). It's just lagging a bit ... regards, tom lane