Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356CF9FB1F1
	for <pgsql-general-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:14:51 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 50282-01-2 for
	<pgsql-general-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:14:45 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311899FB208
	for <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:14:45 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2LGEgJW008990;
	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:14:42 -0400 (EDT)
To: "codeWarrior" <gpatnude@hotmail.com>
cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Anyone still using the sql_inheritance parameter? 
In-reply-to: <etrkj8$15jk$1@news.hub.org> 
References: <28097.1174488581@sss.pgh.pa.us> <etrkj8$15jk$1@news.hub.org>
Comments: In-reply-to "codeWarrior" <gpatnude@hotmail.com>
	message dated "Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:00:25 -0700"
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:14:42 -0400
Message-ID: <8989.1174493682@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200703/1245
X-Sequence-Number: 111434

"codeWarrior" <gpatnude@hotmail.com> writes:
> What is the potential impact for the "ONLY" qualifier ??? None I would 
> expect, as the "ONLY" qualifier effectively sets SQL_INHERITANCE = off for 
> that specific query -- 

> What about "decorated" table names: i.e: "SELECT * FROM cities*" ??? Do we 
> get to keep this feature ?

Sure, I see no need to muck with either of those syntaxes.

			regards, tom lane