pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
'AS' in 'DELETE/UPDATE'
3+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]

* 'AS' in 'DELETE/UPDATE'
@ 2005-11-29 16:01 engineer@hlebprom.ru
  2005-11-29 16:13 ` Re: 'AS' in 'DELETE/UPDATE' Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
  2005-11-29 16:14 ` Re: 'AS' in 'DELETE/UPDATE' Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread

From: engineer@hlebprom.ru @ 2005-11-29 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-sql

Hi.

Maybe I miss something but I can't use 'AS' with 'DELETE' (7.4.3)
Example:

db=# SELECT * FROM temp1 ;
 host_id | user_id | raw | uniq
---------+---------+-----+------
       2 |       1 | 125 |   85
       2 |       2 | 100 |   50
(2 rows)

And there is temp2 just like temp1.

db=# DELETE FROM temp1 AS t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp2 AS t2
WHERE t2.host_id = t1.host_id AND t2.user_id = t1.user_id); 
ERROR:  syntax error at or near "AS" at character 19

but

db=# DELETE FROM temp1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp2 AS t2 WHERE
t2.host_id = temp1.host_id AND t2.user_id = temp1.user_id); 
DELETE 1
db=# SELECT * FROM temp1 ;
 host_id | user_id | raw | uniq
---------+---------+-----+------
       2 |       1 | 125 |   85
(1 row)

It make me supply full name of table...


Another example with UPDATE

db=# UPDATE referer_total AS ref SET ref.raw = ref.raw + u.raw,
     ref.uniq = ref.uniq + u.uniq FROM temp1 AS u
     WHERE u.user_id = ref.user_id AND ref.referer = u.referer;
ERROR:  syntax error at or near "AS" at character 22

db=# UPDATE referer_total SET
db-#        referer_total.raw = referer_total.raw + u.raw,
db-#        referer_total.uniq = referer_total.uniq + u.uniq
db-# FROM temp1 AS u WHERE u.user_id = referer_total.user_id
db-# AND referer_total.referer = u.referer;
ERROR:  syntax error at or near "." at character 46

So it make me rename temp1's "raw" to something else ("r"), "uniq"
too; and 'AS' not possible too. And finally, working version:

UPDATE referer_total SET raw = raw + r, uniq = uniq + u
FROM temp1 AS u WHERE
u.user_id = referer_total.user_id AND
referer_total.referer = u.referer;


It looks strange, are there any limitations or something else that
make it not possible to use 'AS' in 'DELETE' and 'UPDATE'? Of course
with described workarounds I can eliminate that problems, but I want
to know is it so in 8.x? Or why, if it right behaviour?

-- 
engineer




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 'AS' in 'DELETE/UPDATE'
  2005-11-29 16:01 'AS' in 'DELETE/UPDATE' engineer@hlebprom.ru
@ 2005-11-29 16:13 ` Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread

From: Bruce Momjian @ 2005-11-29 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: engineer@hlebprom.ru; +Cc: pgsql-sql


TODO has:

        o Allow an alias to be provided for the target table in
          UPDATE/DELETE

          This is not SQL-spec but many DBMSs allow it.

so we want to add this capability some day.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

engineer@hlebprom.ru wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Maybe I miss something but I can't use 'AS' with 'DELETE' (7.4.3)
> Example:
> 
> db=# SELECT * FROM temp1 ;
>  host_id | user_id | raw | uniq
> ---------+---------+-----+------
>        2 |       1 | 125 |   85
>        2 |       2 | 100 |   50
> (2 rows)
> 
> And there is temp2 just like temp1.
> 
> db=# DELETE FROM temp1 AS t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp2 AS t2
> WHERE t2.host_id = t1.host_id AND t2.user_id = t1.user_id); 
> ERROR:  syntax error at or near "AS" at character 19
> 
> but
> 
> db=# DELETE FROM temp1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM temp2 AS t2 WHERE
> t2.host_id = temp1.host_id AND t2.user_id = temp1.user_id); 
> DELETE 1
> db=# SELECT * FROM temp1 ;
>  host_id | user_id | raw | uniq
> ---------+---------+-----+------
>        2 |       1 | 125 |   85
> (1 row)
> 
> It make me supply full name of table...
> 
> 
> Another example with UPDATE
> 
> db=# UPDATE referer_total AS ref SET ref.raw = ref.raw + u.raw,
>      ref.uniq = ref.uniq + u.uniq FROM temp1 AS u
>      WHERE u.user_id = ref.user_id AND ref.referer = u.referer;
> ERROR:  syntax error at or near "AS" at character 22
> 
> db=# UPDATE referer_total SET
> db-#        referer_total.raw = referer_total.raw + u.raw,
> db-#        referer_total.uniq = referer_total.uniq + u.uniq
> db-# FROM temp1 AS u WHERE u.user_id = referer_total.user_id
> db-# AND referer_total.referer = u.referer;
> ERROR:  syntax error at or near "." at character 46
> 
> So it make me rename temp1's "raw" to something else ("r"), "uniq"
> too; and 'AS' not possible too. And finally, working version:
> 
> UPDATE referer_total SET raw = raw + r, uniq = uniq + u
> FROM temp1 AS u WHERE
> u.user_id = referer_total.user_id AND
> referer_total.referer = u.referer;
> 
> 
> It looks strange, are there any limitations or something else that
> make it not possible to use 'AS' in 'DELETE' and 'UPDATE'? Of course
> with described workarounds I can eliminate that problems, but I want
> to know is it so in 8.x? Or why, if it right behaviour?
> 
> -- 
> engineer
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 'AS' in 'DELETE/UPDATE'
  2005-11-29 16:01 'AS' in 'DELETE/UPDATE' engineer@hlebprom.ru
@ 2005-11-29 16:14 ` Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread

From: Jaime Casanova @ 2005-11-29 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: engineer@hlebprom.ru; +Cc: pgsql-sql

> It looks strange, are there any limitations or something else that
> make it not possible to use 'AS' in 'DELETE' and 'UPDATE'? Of course
> with described workarounds I can eliminate that problems, but I want
> to know is it so in 8.x? Or why, if it right behaviour?
>
> --
> engineer
>

--- extracted from TODO ---

o Allow an alias to be provided for the target table in UPDATE/DELETE

This is not SQL-spec but many DBMSs allow it.

--- end extracting ---

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-29 16:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-29 16:01 'AS' in 'DELETE/UPDATE' engineer@hlebprom.ru
2005-11-29 16:13 ` Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
2005-11-29 16:14 ` Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox