X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9728475F2C for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:57:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10799475F1C for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:57:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2R6vUub009614; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:57:31 -0500 (EST) To: Jodi Kanter Cc: Postgres SQL List Subject: Re: order by In-reply-to: <002701c2f3be$880749b0$de138f80@virginia.edu> References: <002701c2f3be$880749b0$de138f80@virginia.edu> Comments: In-reply-to Jodi Kanter message dated "Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:38:36 -0500" Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:57:30 -0500 Message-ID: <9613.1048748250@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-28.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200303/609 X-Sequence-Number: 12647 Jodi Kanter writes: > Is there a known problem with the SQL order by clause within postgres versi= > on 7.2.3? No ... but it does honor the sorting rules of the locale you initialize the database in. You might want to re-initdb with LC_ALL set to C. regards, tom lane