X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F09ADC02C for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:24:20 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57603-03 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:24:23 +0000 (GMT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BF4DC024 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:24:16 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jAN3OK1D009744; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:24:20 -0500 (EST) To: Luca Pireddu cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: argument type problem with plpgsql function In-reply-to: <200511221922.30830.luca@cs.ualberta.ca> References: <200511221708.10563.luca@cs.ualberta.ca> <20051122161059.H87037@megazone.bigpanda.com> <200511221922.30830.luca@cs.ualberta.ca> Comments: In-reply-to Luca Pireddu message dated "Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:22:30 -0700" Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:24:20 -0500 Message-ID: <9743.1132716260@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.003] X-Spam-Score: 0.003 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/215 X-Sequence-Number: 23466 Luca Pireddu writes: > I just tried it at home on a postgresql 8.0.3 server (debian package) and it > worked the way it's supposed to. Puzzling... Maybe you have more than one blast_evalue() function with different argument types? regards, tom lane