X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1735A475CBC for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:30:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from andrew.brobus.net (ns1.brobus.net [24.129.14.161]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE6647580B for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:30:54 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Off topic : world database Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:33:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <985DF46E87E0C047A3670048DBCAD0556BCD@andrew.brobus.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [SQL] Off topic : world database X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Thread-Index: AcLz/Phq4vAA6QH/QFqO4+wxRlzMHwAAyy1g content-class: urn:content-classes:message From: "Tamir Halperin" To: "Michael A Nachbaur" , "Ryan" , Cc: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_10,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200303/596 X-Sequence-Number: 12634 I would imagine that since neither the size of the earth, nor the laws of m= athematics and geometry have any scheduled changes pending for their source= code any time in the near future, it's reasonable to rely on the long/lat = information and extrapolate the distances using basic planet earth dimensio= ns. There are only so many degrees along the arc of any given sphere (360) and = there are only so many minutes in a degree. The size of the earth represents only one number that needs to be looked up= unless you care to include miles in addition to the international standard= of km. If so, then you have an additional factor to consider in your calcu= alations. Am I making any sense? Tamir > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael A Nachbaur [mailto:mike@nachbaur.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:55 AM > To: Ryan; rudi@oasis.net.au > Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [SQL] Off topic : world database >=20 >=20 > On March 26, 2003 10:56 pm, Ryan wrote: > > Your best bet is buying a good zipcode database that has=20 > lat/long, but > > would only really help you in the USA. This kind of data=20 > tends not to be > > cheap... >=20 > Either that, or web scrape mapquest.com or some other site=20 > that provides=20 > lat/long for returned results, but that probably violates the=20 > acceptable use=20 > policy of those sites. >=20 > I for one would be very interested in such a web service (I'd=20 > really like a=20 > address / street lookup to find lat/longs for addresses, but=20 > thats not likely=20 > to happen). >=20 >=20 > ---------------------------(end of=20 > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >=20