X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53631D1B573; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:14:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33005-05; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:14:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD82BD1B55E; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:14:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9EGEJhn009946; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:14:19 -0400 (EDT) To: "Chris Faulkner" Cc: "Pgsql-Performance" , "Pgsql-Sql" Subject: Re: [SQL] sql performance and cache In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to "Chris Faulkner" message dated "Sat, 11 Oct 2003 10:43:04 +0100" Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:14:19 -0400 Message-ID: <9945.1066148059@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200310/446 X-Sequence-Number: 4194 "Chris Faulkner" writes: > I am seeing this message in my logs. > "bt_fixroot: not valid old root page" That's not good. I'd suggest reindexing that index. regards, tom lane