X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799DA3A420E for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:38:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59560-08 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:38:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from meridius.oneil.com (meridius.oneil.com [66.194.184.36]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6CF3A3C75 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:38:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.20] ([192.168.1.20]:42508 "EHLO daytonnt20.oneilinc.net" ident: "NO-IDENT-SERVICE[2]") by meridius.oneil.com with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:38:41 -0500 Received: from DAYTONEX.oneilinc.net (unverified) by daytonnt20.oneilinc.net (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.14) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:38:35 -0500 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: Re: Error In connection ?? Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:38:35 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [SQL] Error In connection ?? Thread-Index: AcTHU093o5ibjBdzTkKacfU4lRG8xgAASoPQ From: "Goutam Paruchuri" To: "Richard Huxton" Cc: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/115 X-Sequence-Number: 19434 Its works if I specify the ipaddress of each client which is being connecting to the server. Its hard to do it on a DHCP network . Any roundabouts ? - Goutam > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Huxton [mailto:dev@archonet.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 1:30 PM > To: Goutam Paruchuri > Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [SQL] Error In connection ?? > > > Goutam Paruchuri wrote: > > My understanding was it means ip range of 1 to 254. > > > > 192.168.2.1 to 192.168.1.254 > > No, it refers to the number of bits. You can use either of: > 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 > 192.168.2.0/24 > Both of these cover the range: > 192.168.2.1 - 192.168.1.255 > > Might be worth searching for a network howto on CIDR subnet formats. > -- > Richard Huxton > Archonet Ltd > Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended for use only by the person(s) or organization listed in the address. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender at O'Neil & Associates, Inc., immediately. Any copying, dissemination, or distribution of this communication, other than by the intended recipient, is strictly prohibited.