Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A1A1337B82 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:57:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11783-04 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 14:57:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com (mail-fx0-f46.google.com [209.85.161.46]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200B81337B92 for ; Fri, 6 May 2011 11:57:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so2392423fxm.19 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 07:57:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gcPOPbty6KlFcRMPBRGpr3JIqs44N5uTEteffP5IhkA=; b=lZ+sjmvPTkpSAuj6cS5NugRnUf/dSQ4G/Vhdrm+uj7igvZ6CfnIgAan535HTMoyIwz YU8WrlRwpqwkA1Q0feAFChzjCkSJLHl4koaLOEWSkKbuOdiXOBOJ8kDdRRVzr1DG28CP sDTSY3NG30KHOnUG7/tF9gNz/lBCK7/aITbiE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=h/EnsGVa2+bRgpUTxMlQ5YA6EhaAKAz/edV0/VmZIJ9p7RqXkZ84du/AnTNw6WKVwv NlPsKqcrDUoIirU7tdl83sZG/KnUbU4MZmnxT7Xgd5XDdzhgb1smmXQyd8WyQS8NW+7o KvWlx+MW35KcHXlJqRne2gTGbTfIq2lzab2JE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.77.4 with SMTP id e4mr906082fak.51.1304693832939; Fri, 06 May 2011 07:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.74.133 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2011 07:57:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 07:57:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: None numeric exclusion constraints using GIST From: Richard Broersma To: sql pgsql Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.898 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RFC_ABUSE_POST=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201105/35 X-Sequence-Number: 35319 I'll give it another try. :) Is there provision for creating none numeric exclusion constraints on GIST indexes?