Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739FE1337BFE for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:19:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40648-06 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 23:19:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com (mail-iw0-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C151337B69 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 20:19:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so934806iwn.19 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:19:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=hEU1BWWKjUsZ23/F0Ohu14S8gtsqGjVnFS6gfC1KQ+8=; b=OgLfmzeau6NLQNnbjgwlJGADgeJdb+mXoVoPfOCM3umg3KzyF46/dpvcbapOkVbOzW 5ug9XXxFKTNfotoT6NVsTnwfSJPMJTv7Ni3dHteXHVe2/U4epQp1tdWv64QLfbD0svHA +uyeUPxhInKA44q5VDUaAp2MgGBby+8bgcfpg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=OmzH61K86iAv7P7gfd3vv/eDrPbek11ZigI0L9Qpj8PNJj5+T7tDWwh+vwMJNACXDV zqUeGeMQMiRM1QjbRRw7/09p/uaVQ/sxU3M8I63uj/gAhH6eIYHFJLCNb529KKgbavMm g6UVc7sMQRI8jdMn1p9GULrsqGeanu+/6kQjs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.21.146 with SMTP id j18mr7075042ibb.24.1305155973239; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.12.131 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 16:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 01:19:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: CROSS JOIN ordering From: Grzegorz Szpetkowski To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.888 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RFC_ABUSE_POST=0.001, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201105/82 X-Sequence-Number: 35366 I am curious what is proper ordering for cross joining and joining at all for two tables. I look at the example at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/queries-table-expressions.html and there is: SELECT * FROM t1 CROSS JOIN t2; num | name | num | value -----+------+-----+------- 1 | a | 1 | xxx 1 | a | 3 | yyy 1 | a | 5 | zzz 2 | b | 1 | xxx 2 | b | 3 | yyy 2 | b | 5 | zzz 3 | c | 1 | xxx 3 | c | 3 | yyy 3 | c | 5 | zzz (9 rows) I thought that this should be rather: 1 | a | 1 | xxx 2 | b | 1 | xxx 3 | c | 1 | xxx 1 | a | 3 | yyy 2 | b | 3 | yyy 2 | b | 3 | yyy 1 | a | 5 | zzz 2 | b | 5 | zzz 3 | c | 5 | zzz DROP TABLE t1, t2; CREATE TABLE t1 (num int, char name); CREATE TABLE t2 (num int, value varchar(3)); INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1, 'a'), (2, 'b'), (3, 'c'); INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (1, 'xxx'), (2, 'yyy'), (3, 'zzz'); SELECT * FROM t1 CROSS JOIN t2; num | char | num | value -----+------+-----+------- 1 | a | 1 | xxx 2 | b | 1 | xxx 3 | c | 1 | xxx 1 | a | 2 | yyy 2 | b | 2 | yyy 3 | c | 2 | yyy 1 | a | 3 | zzz 2 | b | 3 | zzz 3 | c | 3 | zzz (9 rows) or even (same data as in documentation): DROP TABLE t1, t2; CREATE TABLE t1 (num int, char name); CREATE TABLE t2 (num int, value varchar(3)); INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1, 'a'), (2, 'b'), (3, 'c'); INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (1, 'xxx'), (3, 'yyy'), (5, 'zzz'); SELECT * FROM t1 CROSS JOIN t2; num | char | num | value -----+------+-----+------- 1 | a | 1 | xxx 2 | b | 1 | xxx 3 | c | 1 | xxx 1 | a | 3 | yyy 2 | b | 3 | yyy 3 | c | 3 | yyy 1 | a | 5 | zzz 2 | b | 5 | zzz 3 | c | 5 | zzz (9 rows) Is there any "proper", standard ordering that I can assume for sure ? Maybe PostgreSQL 8.4/9.0 versions have strict ordering and older versions are using mixed ordering depends on something I don't know (I am just guessing). Thanks in advance. Regards, G. Sz.