Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA529FB1EE for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:35:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93364-06 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:35:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 03:00:11.269084 by SQLgrey- Received: from bay0-omc3-s17.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc3-s17.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.246.217]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E769FA27F for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:35:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hotmail.com ([207.46.10.86]) by bay0-omc3-s17.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 4 Oct 2006 09:35:49 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 09:35:48 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 207.46.10.123 by by121fd.bay121.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:35:45 GMT X-Originating-IP: [199.42.80.225] X-Originating-Email: [chrisj.wood@sympatico.ca] X-Sender: chrisj.wood@sympatico.ca In-Reply-To: <4523D6F1.9030504@logix-tt.com> From: "christopher wood" To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Assigning a timestamp without timezone to a timestamp Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:35:45 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Oct 2006 16:35:48.0455 (UTC) FILETIME=[25C6F770:01C6E7D3] X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.391 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_1, ADVANCE_FEE_2, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200610/44 X-Sequence-Number: 26433 Hi Markus, what is AFAICT ? In the commercial space, I believe DB2 is one of the best >From: Markus Schaber >Reply-To: PostgreSQL SQL List >To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org >CC: christopher wood >Subject: Re: [SQL] Assigning a timestamp without timezone to a timestamp >Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:44:49 +0200 > >Hi, Christopher, > >christopher wood wrote: > > > But I can't even take credit for that, my business partner suggested > > using Postgres. > >So I guess he's a smart one, too. :-) > >At least as long as he understands that free software does not mean a >TCO of zero dollars, that's the main mistake when businesses try to jump >on the free software train. > > > I have been a DB2 DBA most of my professional life (25 years) until > > recently, and a huge proponent of DB2 against the likes of Oracle and > > MS-SQL. > >DB2 is not the worst one, AFAICT. > >And as a long-time DBA, you know that administration of a real DBMS is >not "install and forget", but lots of fine-tuning and ongoing care. > > > So far I am very impressed with Postgres but there is a lot more in > > Postgres to get one's head around. I certainly appreciate having people > > like you and Andrew to help me along. > >PostgreSQL is neither perfect, nor a one-fits-all solution. (Hey, that's >the reason for loads of individuals and companies to develop new >releases and extensions, after all. :-) > >But it's a stable DBMS providing most features one would expect and use, >and it has a very supportive community, and commercial supporters and >niche-derivates. > >As long as you want to keep learning, and don't hesitate getting >involved, PostgreSQL will offer you a satisfying experience. > >Regards, >Markus >-- >Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG >Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS > >Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org >www.nosoftwarepatents.org