X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D962D1B523 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:36:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95571-07 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:36:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay2-f124.bay2.hotmail.com [65.54.247.124]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A335D1B51A for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:36:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 05:36:26 -0700 Received: from 202.63.107.19 by by2fd.bay2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:36:26 GMT X-Originating-IP: [202.63.107.19] X-Originating-Email: [m_vijaykumar@hotmail.com] From: "vijaykumar M" To: dev@archonet.com, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: few questions ..? Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:36:26 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Sep 2003 12:36:26.0537 (UTC) FILETIME=[A2F27190:01C38361] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200309/306 X-Sequence-Number: 15284 Thanks richards ..i will go through that doc.. With Regards Vijay >From: Richard Huxton >To: "vijaykumar M" , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org >Subject: Re: [SQL] few questions ..? >Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:07:00 +0100 > >On Thursday 25 September 2003 09:36, vijaykumar M wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have few questions, kindly suggest your comments on this.. > > > > 1. Is that postgres supports distributed database ? > > In oracle, by creating Dblink we can communicate the remorte > > database from the local one. How you could implement this in postgres > > database. > >See contrib/dblink. I think someone is looking at linking to Oracle too >(but I >might be wrong about that). > > > 2. Is there any way to cache the table on memorry ? > > In oracle, we can use the cache statement at the table >creation > > itself. > >PG uses the operating-system rather than replacing it. If you're using the >table regularly it should end up in cache. If you're not using it >regularly, >you probably didn't want it in cache anyway. > > > 3. List out the main tuning parameters in postgres.conf to take >care > > of supporing millions of records. > >See http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/index.php >There are two documents there describing the various config settings and >the >basics of performance tuning. > >Millions of records don't need too much tuning even on a standard PC, but >the >standard config settings are *very* conservative. > >-- > Richard Huxton > Archonet Ltd > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org _________________________________________________________________ Answer simple questions. Win a free honeymoon. http://server1.msn.co.in/sp03/shaadi/index.asp Sail into the sunset!