Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F162133817F for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:54:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21600-01-2 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:53:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:06:39.379457 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail164.messagelabs.com (mail164.messagelabs.com [216.82.253.131]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB571337DFE for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:36:43 -0300 (ADT) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: TGood@svwsjmc.org X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-164.messagelabs.com!1300383000!32017867!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.9; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [38.96.154.97] Received: (qmail 16029 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2011 17:30:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.svwsjmc.org) (38.96.154.97) by server-2.tower-164.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Mar 2011 17:30:01 -0000 Received: from SVWEMAIL.svwestj.local ([172.22.80.151]) by SVWEMAIL ([172.22.80.151]) with mapi; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:29:57 -0400 From: "Good, Thomas" To: John DeSoi CC: "pgsql-sql@postgresql.org" Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:27:22 -0400 Subject: Re: Bizarreness at A2 Hosting Thread-Topic: [SQL] Bizarreness at A2 Hosting Thread-Index: AcvkxXbJnVJbwR95Q8iHW24lWXpytAAAxyQq Message-ID: References: , <82BDCB41-761A-4615-B591-EB83FB492792@pgedit.com> In-Reply-To: <82BDCB41-761A-4615-B591-EB83FB492792@pgedit.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.401 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_IS_IT_OUR_ACCOUNT=2.299, FROM_DOMAIN_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201103/28 X-Sequence-Number: 35230 Hi John, No the two hosts are separate and so it's two separate pg templates. The techie told me, "well, it's ok, because you can see his table but you c= an't access his data..." egads ________________________________________ From: John DeSoi [desoi@pgedit.com] Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:05 PM To: Good, Thomas Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [SQL] Bizarreness at A2 Hosting On Mar 17, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Good, Thomas wrote: > 4) try to run pg_dump - it fails as it is unable to lock this other guy's= table > > tech suppt argues with me that their template is not hosed, "that is the = nature of postgre," he said (not a typo, he omitted the trailing s) > > These guys are recommended by postgresql.org so I figured I'd try em... > I have another account (for a client whom I support pro bono) and they do= not have this problem. New databases are empty as one would expect. > > Can someone tell me what exactly the problem is - I am waiting for a supe= rvisor to call me back and I'd like to lead him to the answer so he can fix= the problem. I think you are right -- they likely have some one's stuff in the template = database. On your account that does not have the problem -- is it on the sa= me host? John DeSoi, Ph.D.