MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAN6TVjmdUGuFrCn4HcUd4Q2uvNXZSEe_4TXG7neQip_m6dGiBQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAN6TVjmdUGuFrCn4HcUd4Q2uvNXZSEe_4TXG7neQip_m6dGiBQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 10:46:01 +1300
Message-ID: 
 <CAApHDvo_oS=-roQf29NJ0UQKkYEhSPb3oxqFEz5t-93n0ttb6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Oracle ==> Postgres View
To: Sam Stearns <sam.stearns@dat.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAApHDvo_oS%3D-roQf29NJ0UQKkYEhSPb3oxqFEz5t-93n0ttb6Q%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 10:31, Sam Stearns <sam.stearns@dat.com> wrote:
>     coalesce(CASE WHEN impact_category='BULK_RATE_REQUEST', 1, -- To handle Portal's category for the old RIP
>        'CONTRACT_BULK_RATE', 1,
>        'SPOT_BULK_RATE', 2,
>        'CONTRACT_HISTORY', 3,
>        'SPOT_HISTORY', 4,
>        'RATE_SUBMISSION', 5,
>        'SPOT_BACKHAUL' THEN  6 END , 0),
>
> Would anyone be able to advise how to correct this for Postgres, please?

Have a look at the syntax of your case statement and check it against [1].

David

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-conditional.html